Hi, Wolfram
> From: Wolfram Sang <[email protected]>
>
> Reported-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c
> index 616433d387cdb2..ef26e933b1e9cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c
> @@ -612,7 +612,10 @@ static int rcar_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (IS_ERR(priv->io))
> return PTR_ERR(priv->io);
>
> + pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> + pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
> rcar_i2c_init(priv);
> + pm_runtime_put(dev);
Please correct me if I'm misunderstanding, but in my experience,
above rcar_i2c_init() result can be removed if SoC has power-off feature,
and if IP doesn't keep register value power-off case ?
This case register doesn't keep myfunc_A's setting,
because it calls pm_runtime_put()
pm_runtime_get_sync()
myfunc_A()
pm_runtime_put()
...
pm_runtime_get_sync()
myfunc_B()
pm_runtime_put()
It should be this ?
pm_runtime_get_sync()
myfunc_A()
myfunc_B()
pm_runtime_put()
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
