On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 09:48:37AM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 09:09:26AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > Hello Wolfram, > > > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 08:52:38AM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 08:44:47AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > > > Other than that, the NULL pointer dereference should only happen if the > > > > device was bound using the driver name. That might be worth to point out > > > > in the commit log. So maybe make (in a separate patch) the probe > > > > function fail when probed by name? > > > > > > RCar is a DT only platform. > > > > Does this imply that no checking is needed? I'm not sure. > > I don't see how this driver could get probed otherwise. That being said, > for the "better safe than sorry" approach, I'd accept your suggestion.
Try adding the following to a device tree: i2c-rcar { } This creates a platform device with name=i2c-rcar which makes platform_match() yield a match for your driver. (The other alternative is a device with this name created by a platform file (even if this is not an rcar machine) doesn't trigger that problem here I think, because there is a platform_device_id with a matching name). See also http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2083641 for a similar discussion. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html