> The comment refers to datasheet, not really to the code. And eventual changes > to the datasheet > that's what can make it invalid (though I don't know TI's plans on it). > Nevertheless, yes, I > think, it's better to drop the comment. Should I re-spin the patch with > comment removal in it?
Thanks. Even better would be replacing the comment: can you give a short explanation why there is now 12MHz and what needs to be considered if the value is to be changed again?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
