David Mosberger <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thursday, February 24, 2005 10:12 PM:
>>>>>> On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 18:22:44 -0800, "Seth, Rohit" >>>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Rohit> I think we should have some consistency (wherever possible) > Rohit> in /proc/cpuinfo fields across architectures. This will help > Rohit> applications writers. Currently siblings and cpu core fields > Rohit> are already added for i386 and x86_64. > > Hmmh, I don't see a "cpu core id" field in the x86 code. Am I missing > something? > "Cpu Cores" identifying the number of cores in a physical package is present in x86_64 and not there in i386 tree. Will following work: Physical id: Identifying the unique physical package id for LEU Core id: Identifying the unique core id on that specific physical package Siblings: Identifying the total number LEUs on that physical package. Siblings is the one that apps have already started using on i386. -rohit - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
