>> global cache purge in their chipset implementation. (For such cases, Intel >> provided a SAL >> table entry to specify if ptc.g is allowed and how many). > > This seems odd. You never use that sal call to initialized noptcg. > Is that an oversight?
The mechanism is a SAL table entry, not a SAL call. Currently that entry provides no mechanism to specify that ptc.g should not be used at all (the entry provides the count of how many ptc.g can happen in parallel, but the spec says that the value "0" means "1" :-( ) There is an ongoing discussion with DIG64 to use a currently reserved field in the table to specify the value "0". If that change is approved, then we can add code to enable Natalie's code based on the SAL table. -Tony - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
