On 9/5/07, Robin Holt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > No :) those interested are big hardware makers of large scaled out
> > boxes, such as HP, UIS. They are using own asics and are not
> > necessarily being able to keep chipset native capabilities intact. As
> > I said in the preamble, the mechanism has to be there so they can turn
> > the ptc.g off and run the OS.
>
> This really sounds like it is best done as a machvec.  Currently, Altix
> (sn2) does not have a ptc.g that spans nodes.  We have our own tlb purge
> mechanism which is very flexible and scalable.  Maybe it would be best
> to follow that example.  To repeat Bjorn's comments, this area can be
> fraught with _VERY_ difficult to diagnose problems.  A boot test can
> hardly be expected to uncover all the races so be patient while we walk
> through this code.
>
All right, all right ... :) I'll do the machvec then. Thanks guys,
will peek into the sn2 to get an idea.

Regards,
--Natalie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to