On Mer, 2005-02-02 at 08:31, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > Merges drivers/ide/pci/*.h files into their corresponding *.c > > files. Rationales are > > 1. There's no reason to separate pci drivers into header and > > body. No header file is shared and they're simple enough. > > 2. struct pde_pci_device_t *_chipsets[] are _defined_ in the > > header files. That isn't the custom and there's no good > > reason to do differently in these drivers. > > 3. Tracking changelogs shows that the bugs fixed by 00 and 01 > > are introduced during mass-updating ide pci drivers by > > forgetting to update *.h files. > > Personally, I agree. However, I would ask Alan for his rationale before > applying this...
Historically they were split so they stayed split. SCSI has mostly (c/o hch) switched away from that and it seems sensible for IDE to do so. > > > 07_ide_reg_valid_t_endian_fix.patch > > > > ide_reg_valid_t contains bitfield flags but doesn't reverse > > bit orders using __*_ENDIAN_BITFIELD macros. And constants > > for ide_reg_valid_t, IDE_{TASKFILE|HOB}_STD_{IN|OUT}_FLAGS, > > are defined as byte values which are correct only on > > little-endian machines. This patch defines reversed constants > > and .h byte union structure to make things correct on big > > endian machines. The only code which uses above macros is in > > flagged_taskfile() and the code is currently unused, so this > > patch doesn't change any behavior. (The code will get used in > > later patches.) > > doesn't this "fix" change behavior on existing big endian machines? My question too, remember that there is I/O byte order swizzling afoot in the I/O macros. Generally looks good IMHO. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html