> (correctly probably). Question is, where is the irq coming from then. > > Obviously this is a horribly wrong fix, since if the interrupt is shared, we > will shadow the other interrupt so it never gets run (and corrupt our own > BM DMA operations).
I wonder if it's left over from the resume I/O completing or the chip coming back up in a stupid state. What occurs if the bit is cleared during the early resume before IRQs are turned back on ? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
