Adam J. Richter wrote:
Hi Tejun and Jeff,
The discussion about the vt6421 problems caused me to glance
at the code and try a very minor clean-up to vt6421_init_addrs().
Please note that I don't have a vt6421, so this patch is UNTESTED.
The patch does two things:
1. Elminate the bmdma_addr variable, which was only used once,
in an assignment to a field also named bmdma_addr. So having
a separate variable served no documentary purpose. This change
causes the value to be computed a little later, so please make
sure that that is OK. The effect is just to make the source
code one line smaller. The binary size is unchanged by this
modification, at least on my x86 configuration, which has
SMP and lots of debugging options activated.
2. Add a variable ata_ports, to replace the six times the
same value appeared to be computed. I assume the compiler
was smart enough to avoid most of the recomputation, but
this change shrinks the .text by 7 bytes in my configuration,
makes the routine more readable and reduces opportunities for
typos.
If it looks OK to everyone, please forward it upstream as
appropriate.
Adam Richter
Patch seems OK in theory, except for two procedural stumbling blocks:
1) always always always include a signed-off-by line in your kernel
patches. see http://linux.yyz.us/patch-format.html or
Documentation/SubmittingPatches in the kernel tree.
2) this was stirred a bit more by recent changes, so a rediff + resend
would be appreciated
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
