On 02.07.2007 13:24, Chr wrote: > On Monday, 2. July 2007, you wrote: >> On 02.07.2007 07:02, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> Hmmm. From looking at the ICH8-Datasheet ( >> http://www.intel.com/design/chipsets/datashts/313056.htm >> or http://download.intel.com/design/chipsets/datashts/31305603.pdf ) >> page 189 and later it seems to me that the ICH8M (just as all the other >> Intel-Chipsets I know) officially only supports Ultra ATA 100 (and not >> 133!). >> So is the ich_pata_133 correct in the patch (see quoted line above)? > For some strange reason, I can not get the pdf... > Anyway, the original patch had "ich_pata_100". > see: http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-ide%40vger.kernel.org/msg07416.html
k, missed that post. > but Alan Cox wrote: > http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-ide%40vger.kernel.org/msg07417.html >> Its ich_pata_133 - all the newer chips are. Intel afaik never supported Ultra ATA 133 officially in any of the mainstream desktop or mobile chipsets. >> They work even better if you >> set them into AHCI mode in the BIOS and then they should "just work" with >> recent kernels as the AHCI driver now matches by class. > And "Gaston, Jason D" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> didn't complain about it. > it's a "bit" confusing with all "native" AHCI SATA chipset that have to > emulate > PATA for compatibility reasons... Well, just FYI: on my Laptop AHCI is enabled and used for the SATA hard disk. But the DVD drive still is a pata one afaics (I'm not in front of the machine, so I can't check), connected via the pata controller -- so for me there is no emulation involved (at least afaics). > So, whom can we trust? I'd trust the public datasheet in this case. CU thl - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
