Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 13:42:16 -0400
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(just to provide my indicator of status)
Thanks.
libata-add-irq_flags-to-struct-pata_platform_info-fix.patch
are other pata_platform people happy with this? I don't know embedded
well enough to know if adding this struct member will break things.
This is just a silly remove-unneeded-cast-of-void* cleanup. I wrote this
as a fixup against
libata-add-irq_flags-to-struct-pata_platform_info.patch with the intention
of folding it into that base patch, but you went and merged the submitter's
original patch so this trivial fixup got stranded in -mm. Feel free to give
it the piss-off-too-trivial treatment.
I'm sorry, I didn't look closely enough. I was referring to the
add-irq-flags patch itself, not your small fix.
ata-ahci-alpm-store-interrupt-value.patch
ata-ahci-alpm-expose-power-management-policy-option-to-users.patch
ata-ahci-alpm-enable-link-power-management-for-ata-drivers.patch
ata-ahci-alpm-enable-aggressive-link-power-management-for-ahci-controllers.patch
These appear to need some work.
seemed mostly OK to me. what comments did I miss?
Oh, I thought these were the patches which affected scsi and which James
had issues with. I guess I got confused.
hrm. ISTR James wanted some cleanups, Kristen did some cleanups, then
looking at the cleanups decided they were needed / appropriate at this time.
Anyway, these are in my mbox queue and the libata portions (of which the
code is the majority) seem OK. Need to give them a final review.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
