Alan Cox wrote:
Underneath all the HPT packaging, PCI identifiers, binary driver modules
and stuff you find that ...
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- drivers/ata/sata_mv.c~ 2007-07-09 13:19:57.003052904 +0100
+++ drivers/ata/sata_mv.c 2007-07-09 13:19:57.004052752 +0100
@@ -573,6 +573,9 @@
{ PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x5041), chip_504x },
{ PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x5080), chip_5080 },
{ PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x5081), chip_508x },
+ /* RocketRAID 1740/174x have different identifiers */
+ { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x1740), chip_508x },
+ { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x1742), chip_508x },
If your testers could re-test on top of what I just submitted to Linus,
that would be most helpful. My non-RocketRAID 5081 works just fine, but
sata_mv received some major changes and bug fixes, which could
potentially change behavior here.
Since we're guessing (I assume?), I definitely want to make sure we have
the correct MV variant for use with RocketRAID.
Any idea if RocketRAID is marketed as SATA-II or with NCQ support?
("queueing" in marketing lit doesn't help, alas).
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
