> On Sat, 15 May 1999, Ishai Parasol wrote:
>
> > I heard that 2.3.0 is out so you should probably use this one.
> not to mention the fact that 2.3.0 is just a 2.2.(i dont remember what
> number) kernel with a new revision number, I'd like to mention something
> which should have been common knowledge, but from the amount of people
> suggesting to use a 2.3 kernel, apearently it isn't so :
> 2.3.x kernel is a development kernel - it has an 'odd' number for it's
> minor revision number, like 2.1.x - it's not supposed to be stable and
> should only be used by people who like to debug lot's of strange mishaps
> and want to help in kernel development. all other users should stick with
> 'even' numbered minor revisions, like 2.2.x and 2.0.x .
Agreed. The 2.3.1 not even booted up! ;) [2.3.2 is out but....]
Stay away from 2.3.x series if you are not a developer, crazy or both!
;)
Daniel
