On Sun, Feb 10, 2002, Shlomi Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote the following: > I am usually experienced enough with enought technologies to know if > something is missing. For instance, when I hacked a Python script I found, > I was looking for a way to concatenate two arrays (i.e: the equivalent of > @a,@b in perl) because I knew I've seen it in Perl. I eventaully could not > find a Python primitive to do it, and I even found a web-page that said > Python did not have such. (a,b in python will give an array containing > the array "a" as its first element and "b" as its second. %-))
Forgive me for picking on such a minor point, but I can't bear to see my
beloved Python maligned by the notion that it has no primitive operation for
concatenating arrays. Such an operation is incredibly simple in Python, as the
following snippet from a session with the interactive Python interpreter shows:
>>> a = [1, 2, 3]
>>> b = [4, 5, 6, 7]
>>> c = a + b
>>> print c
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]
This operation is very well documented in both the Python Tutorial
<http://www.python.org/doc/current/tut/node5.html#SECTION005140000000000000000>
and in the Python Library Reference
<http://www.python.org/doc/current/lib/typesseq.html>.
--
{ Daniel Jacob Pearson | sensible driver at }
{ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | -- jeff covey }
msg17623/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
