On Thursday 02 December 2004 16:51, Amit Roseberger wrote: > Unfortunately for me, it seems as if the new Monitor I just received was > broken. (I've tested it on a few other boxes always with the same > results... blurry strap that runs from the upper end of the screen to > the bottom.)
Hmmm.. A monitor with bad display under Linux is later found to be mulfunctioning. Over the years, most of the times I had "weird" hardware behavior with Linux, I later found out the hardware was broken (memory chips, motherboard, fans/heat, UDMA disk from WD that had buggy UDMA firmware, etc.) > >>How come Windows (I.E) detection of new hardware is superior? (I have to > >>apologize on this last sentence in advance.. but at least in my > >>experience it is) Theorem: If it does not work right with Linux, the hardware is probably broken :-) Corollary: When you want a certification for quality hardware, always ask: "Can you show me how it works with Linux?" -- Oron Peled Voice/Fax: +972-4-8228492 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.actcom.co.il/~oron ICQ UIN: 16527398 May the Source be with you! ================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
