OK, I replaced the Hard drive for a new one,

It does not have any bad blocks or FS on it when I checked (using a
live cd and bad blocks like before), now when I install either debian
stable with 2.6.8 or Fedora Core 5, I'm getting
dma_intr: status=0x51 {DriveReady SeekComplete Error }

Then I re-run the same live cd with bad blocks, and still no bad
blocks where found ...

The hard drive is Hitachi HDS728080PLAT20 .
The motherboard is GigaByte P4 Titan (GA-8VM800PMD-775), and of curse Pentium 4.

IDE connectors using SATA cable.

I found some entries on Google, but such as
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=37451&highlight=hda+dmaintr+status+0x51+driveready+seekcomplete+error
But it does not seems to work for me (the change of hdparms).

Any suggestions, ideas ?
Maybe I'm missing a module that should be loaded ?

Thanks,

Ido

On 6/29/06, Ez-Aton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



One could assume so.

Bad blocks are being reported when there are bad blocks. No more, no less.




It might be that the hard drive suffers from temperature problem, and starts
failing only after X hours of continues work. It might be that the disk is
failed right from the start, and the person with the NTFS (let me guess -
KSP?) had formatted the HD a quick format. Formatting it a slow format
should not leave bad blocks on the formatted data (as it cleans the bad
blocks out), but should leave a report saying such and such bad blocks were
found. It only takes time.




Ez.




ik wrote:

It seems that with a new Linux destribution the problem continues ...
 So I guess the problem is the HD ?

 Ido

 On 6/29/06, ik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi,

 The drive is SATA 1 (IDE with "special" cable).

 As far as I found, it does supported under 2.6.8 (the default kernel
 for debian stable in the 2.6 family).

 Ido

 On 6/29/06, Andre Bar'yudin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 > What kind of drive do you have?  SCSI, SATA or IDE?  It could be that
 > your particular controller is not supported properly by your kernel,
 > hence no errors under Windows...
 >
 > --
 > Andre Bar'yudin
 > http://www.baryudin.com/
 >
 > On 6/29/06, ik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 > > Hi,
 > >
 > > Well I have this new computer, when I installed debian stable on it, I
 > > kept on getting dma_errors messages, and badblocks found some bad
 > > sectors.
 > >
 > > Now I have few questions (sorry if some of them are annoying ;)):
 > > 1. Is there any patch for the Kernel that makes this type of error
 > > messages much more friendlier (even a 3rd party project is good).
 > >
 > > 2. At the beginning the place that this computer where bought made a
 > > QA with Windows, with NTFS, but it could not find this bad sectors, so
 > > what does the Linux kernel does different to find such problems that
 > > users can not find it in Windows ?
 > >
 > > 3. There was a rummer that I/O in 2.6 should be rewritten, to make it
 > > more stable on errors, was there any such approach on the new kernels
 > > ?
 > >
 > > Thanks,
 > >
 > > Ido
 > >
 > >
=================================================================
 > > To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
 > > the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
 > > echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 > >
 > >
 >
 >
=================================================================
 > To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
 > the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
 > echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 >
 >



=================================================================

 To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
 the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
 echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]




=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to