On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 03:55:51PM +0200, Dotan Cohen wrote: > On 23/03/07, Moderator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Thursday March 22 2007, Peter wrote: > >> Again the list police ate a message of mine. No, it did not use any > >> offensive language. > >Found and forwarded (Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>). It is the bayesian > >filter that kicks in and marks it as spam. I am adding a procmail rule > >locally to handle the false positives originating from your address. > >Hopefully, that will improve the situation. Instead of resending the same > >message (that only increases your spam score), or complaining on the list, > >you always can send me the contents of Message-Id: header privately and I > >will look it up the spam queue. > > > > Would it be possible to whitelist addresses that have X posts? I'd > imagine any X larger than 10 should suffice.
I like this idea. (silly test) -- Tzafrir Cohen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | VIM is http://tzafrir.org.il | | a Mutt's [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | best ICQ# 16849755 | | friend t ================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
