I wonder if I'm the first one to say: http://gallery.sf.net 
one of the most amazing webapp I've seen.

Gallery1 works on raw filesystem + data file,
Gallery2 keeps the data in DB (mysql but probably others as well).

I think it fits MOST of your requirements.

 - Oren

On Wednesday, 8 August 2007 00:47:24 Nadav Har'El wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Like most people with a digital camera, I've amassed thousands of photos
> on my hard disk. Viewing them with "xv", my trusty but long-in-the-tooth
> image viewer, has become unwieldy, if not damn near impossible. I also
> really miss the possibility to *search* on my photos without going over all
> the pictures every time - something which I find myself doing very often
> for various occasions.
>
> So basically, I'm looking for a photo management application for Linux.
> Something like Picassa would have been a good start, but not good enough,
> as you'll see below in my wish-list. I also tried f-spot and it's not good
> enough. So I was wondering, maybe the wise people of this list can
> recommend a good photo management application for Linux?
>
> Here is my wishlist for a photo manager. In fact, I'm wishing for these
> features so much, that I'm itching to write one myself... (but I hope it
> doesn't have to get to that).
>
> 1. I don't want any sort of vendor lock-in, forcing me to stay with a
> certain application once I choose it. Therefore:
>
>    a. The photo manager should be able to work on a normal filesystem
>       hierarchy of photos, neither ruining it nor making a complete copy.
>
>    b. Whichever metadata the photo manager wants to save (like tags - see
>       below) it should save in an open, simple and potentially-standard
> file format.
>       Not in an uber-complex database, and not (given 1a) to the photo
> files themselves. Picasa and f-spot both fail in this regard - I didn't
> manage to extract the meta-data I save in them to any readable format.
>
> 2. The application should allow me to easily and quickly browse all my
> photos in different sizes (like in picassa).
>
> 3. The application should allow me to add textual descriptions and "tags"
>    to pictures, and have a full-featured text search engine to search
> these.
>
>    For example, I can add to each picture tags specifying the persons in
> the picture, location of the picture, and so on, and then, for example,
> search for all pictures containing a specific person. F-spot's tags are a
> good start, while Picassa's folders are a worthless disaster. But remember
> 1b - these tags need to be saved in a simple format, not in a propriatary
> database. I don't want to spend hours to type tags in, and then be unable
> to use them if I switch software. I don't loose my C code if I switch from
> VI to Emacs!
>
> 4. Bonus points for some automatically-generated "tags" based on dates,
>    camera, colors, and other information obtainable from the picture files.
>
> 5. I want a digital photo manager, not a digital camera manager, and not a
>    sophisticated photo editor - for which separate applications are
> available.
>
> 6. Bonus points for an application that doubles as (or is only) a Web-
>    application - allowing others to "log in" to the application over the
> web, and see my pictures according to access controls I specify (e.g., I
> can say that a specific person can only see pictures with some specific
> tag).
>
>    Extra bonus points for a Web application that can host picture
> collection uploaded by several users, allow them to manage their own photos
> and others so see only some (as above), and perhaps help with the tagging
> task. I'm looking for something small, though, not something capable of
> running a huge site like as flickr.com.
>
>
> So, can anyone point me to a good (according to my definition of good ;-))
> digital photo manager? Or shall I be forced to write one myself?



=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to