Hi, 

I tried to follow up 
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il/msg52344.html , and still 
got undesired behabior. 
For example I tried to rename eth1 to eth2 and view the results with ifconfig 
running 
#sbin/ifconfig 
shows interfaces eth0 and eth1 
no I turned off eth1 
/#sbin/ifdown eth1 
rename it 
#/sbin/nameif eth2 <desired mac address> 
turn on eth2 
#/sbin/ifup eth2 
Ends successfully but /sbin/ifconfig still shows interface eth0 and eth1 

Still puzzled! 

Yaron Kahanovitch 

Here is the details: 
#/sbin/ifconfig 

eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0F:FE:7F:CF:E5 
inet addr:172.16.10.75 Bcast:172.16.10.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 
inet6 addr: fe80::20f:feff:fe7f:cfe5/64 Scope:Link 
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 
RX packets:3927 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 
TX packets:2587 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100 
RX bytes:4930081 (4.7 MiB) TX bytes:205327 (200.5 KiB) 
Memory:f0180000-f01a0000 

eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1B:21:10:AB:B5 
inet addr:192.168.0.1 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 
inet6 addr: fe80::21b:21ff:fe10:abb5/64 Scope:Link 
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 
TX packets:94 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100 
RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:16601 (16.2 KiB) 
Base address:0x1100 Memory:f0200000-f0220000 

lo Link encap:Local Loopback 
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 
inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host 
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 
RX packets:2782 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 
TX packets:2782 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 
RX bytes:3341308 (3.1 MiB) TX bytes:3341308 (3.1 MiB) 

Now lets turn off eth0 and eth1 
#/sbin/ifdown eth0 
#/sbin/ifdown eth1 

/sbin/ifconfig 
lo Link encap:Local Loopback 
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 
inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host 
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 
RX packets:3294 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 
TX packets:3294 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 
RX bytes:3355660 (3.2 MiB) TX bytes:3355660 (3.2 MiB) 

Lets rename the interface eth1: 
#/sbin/nameif eth2 00:1B:21:10:AB:B5 
#/sbin/ifup eth2 

#sbin/ifconfig 
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1B:21:10:AB:B5 
inet addr:192.168.0.1 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 
inet6 addr: fe80::21b:21ff:fe10:abb5/64 Scope:Link 
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 
TX packets:101 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100 
RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:17107 (16.7 KiB) 
Base address:0x1100 Memory:f0200000-f0220000 

lo Link encap:Local Loopback 
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 
inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host 
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 
RX packets:3294 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 
TX packets:3294 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 
RX bytes:3355660 (3.2 MiB) TX bytes:3355660 (3.2 MiB) 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "shimi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Cc: "Israeli Linux mailing-list" <linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il>, "yaron" <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>, "nir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Ran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent: Monday, July 7, 2008 10:33:00 AM (GMT+0200) Asia/Jerusalem 
Subject: Re: switching eth4 and eth0 



On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 10:04 AM, < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: 


Hi guys, 

This is silly, but at this one I find myself totaly helpless. 
I have two cards (on a fedora core 8 station), a gigabit, on board and a 
10/100. The Gigabit card is mapped to eth2 
and the 10/100 is mapped to eth4. 
One of the libraries uses flexlm for licensing purposes. The license file is 
keyed on th 10/100 interface's MAC address. 
Unfortunately, the flexlm likes to use eth0 to verify the mac address. 
To solve the problem I tried to change the eth4 interface to eth0 without 
success. 

Can anyone help me with that? 



There was a thread about this 4 days ago... 

http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il/msg52344.html 

-- Shimi 

Reply via email to