I tested on my debian (lenny) machine and have the same problem. A CentOS
5.2 machine with version 3.1.8 of 'at' and GMT as the timezone did not have
this problem.

Chaim

On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Avraham Rosenberg <for.avra...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi,
> Here is the output of atq:
> avraham6e32:/tmp$ atq
> 48      Wed Dec 31 21:40:00 2008 a avraham
> 52      Fri Jan  1 06:00:00 2010 a avraham
> 49      Fri Jan  1 05:00:00 2010 a avraham
> 51      Fri Jan  1 06:45:00 2010 a avraham
>
> The command, corresponding to the last line was:
>  at -m -f fvivaceRec-2 06:45 tomorrow
>
> Apparently Thursday/the year 2009 bring bad luck, so it avoids them...
>
> Date, on the other hand is less superstitious:
> avraham6e32:/tmp$ date -d 'tomorrow'
> Thu Jan  1 19:22:38 IST 2009
>
> Version:
> at -V
> at version 3.1.9
> Bug reports to: rmur...@debian.org (Ryan Murray)
> Garbled time
>
> System:
>  uname -a
> Linux debian 2.6.24-1-486 #1 Mon Feb 11 13:52:45 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux
>
> I guess I should file a bug report. Never did such a thing before. Where
> can I find guidlines/examples ? Or, maybe, I blundered ?
>
> Cheers, Avraham
> And a good year 2009, despite what my at may think !
>
> --
> Please avoid sending to this address Excell or Powerpoint attachments.
>
> =================================================================
> To unsubscribe, send mail to linux-il-requ...@cs.huji.ac.il with
> the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
> echo unsubscribe | mail linux-il-requ...@cs.huji.ac.il
>
>
  • bug in at ? Avraham Rosenberg
    • Re: bug in at ? Chaim Keren-Tzion

Reply via email to