2009/1/30 Oleg Goldshmidt <p...@goldshmidt.org>: > Well, this whole topic is almost as old as Linux-IL, but since we are > at it again... IMHO, the "reply-to-all to send to the list" paradigm > is totally broken. If I send a message to a discussion mailing list > such as Linux-IL I expect any responses to be sent to the list, > period. If I reply to a mailing list posting I reply to the list, > unless I have a really good reason to do something else. This has been > the netiquette of group communications since the times of Usenet. By > the way, the semantics means that the list should be in "To", and > anyone else in "Cc", not the other way around. Sophisticated filtering > rules, for instance, may treat different headers differently (see > below). >
This is, and still is, the only list where this is still a problem. Only in linux-il do I see the TO and CC lines fill up. I agree with you: Reply should go to the list. Only on Linux-IL mus I do Reply All, and then I see "Oleg" in the To and "linux-il" in the CC. Basackwards. I usually edit it, but sometime (like now) I'm just lazy and leave it. -- Dotan Cohen http://what-is-what.com http://gibberish.co.il א-ב-ג-ד-ה-ו-ז-ח-ט-י-ך-כ-ל-ם-מ-ן-נ-ס-ע-ף-פ-ץ-צ-ק-ר-ש-ת ا-ب-ت-ث-ج-ح-خ-د-ذ-ر-ز-س-ش-ص-ض-ط-ظ-ع-غ-ف-ق-ك-ل-م-ن-ه-و-ي А-Б-В-Г-Д-Е-Ё-Ж-З-И-Й-К-Л-М-Н-О-П-Р-С-Т-У-Ф-Х-Ц-Ч-Ш-Щ-Ъ-Ы-Ь-Э-Ю-Я а-б-в-г-д-е-ё-ж-з-и-й-к-л-м-н-о-п-р-с-т-у-ф-х-ц-ч-ш-щ-ъ-ы-ь-э-ю-я ä-ö-ü-ß-Ä-Ö-Ü _______________________________________________ Linux-il mailing list Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il