I think there are a couple of points that did not come across.
The first is that this is an embedded system. It runs an ARM CPU, has
32MB of RAM and 4MB of flash. If we pass the 2MB of (somewhat
compressed) filesystem usage mark, we will be in deep s%^$ when we get
to the "switching banks" part of the software upgrade.
From the Monit web site:
It is a small program and weights in at just over 300kB
That is a HUGE price to pay just to do what I need (15% of my total
allocated storage).
The second part that did not come across is that there is no problem to
implement what I need. I already did, and it is working beautifully. My
question was whether anyone can give a reason why using ptrace in a
production system is not a good idea, because I have my doubts.
Noam Meltzer wrote:
Shachar,
What you need is the functionality of a watchdog.
A watchdog is something that periodically monitors a process, and does
something if the process is not up. This has nothing to do with what I
need. I need to restart a process. A one time operation of stopping and
then starting another process.
HA clusters provide this functionality. Anyhow, I guess you don't
have/need an HA cluster, so what you might want to look at is monit:
http://mmonit.com/monit/
Like I said, even had monit been what I needed, I cannot afford the
300KB it takes.
I understand that you want to monitor it using your own daemon,
No. I do not want to monitor it at all, my daemon or otherise. I want to
restart it. This is something completely different.
but I don't believe that you can reinvent the wheel in a reasonable
time and effort, so I point you to Monit.
The main loop for a watchdog daemon takes about 20-40 lines of code and
about two hours to implement. Even had a watchdog been what I needed, I
doubt sacrificing 15% of my storage for monit would have been worth it.
Shachar
_______________________________________________
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
