On 6/10/10, shimi <linux...@shimi.net> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Oleg Goldshmidt <p...@goldshmidt.org> wrote: >> >> Are there licenses that allow private modifications but not >> distribution of either original or modified program? >> > I know of at least one, though it was not part of a Well Known License, > rather than the license terms the guy invented by himself. The qmail MTA. > Its author allowed redistribution
So it is not what I am looking for. > in source code form only, and IIRC, > without changes to the source (you had to attach patches and let end users > do the patching artwork). Binary distribution, even of unmodified code, was > not allowed. That may not fit the "Open Source Definition" then, and make it therefore "special", but not in the same sense. > The license behind Firefox doesn't allow you to distribute a binary branded > with the Mozilla name - might also be related to what you're looking? Nope. Thanks a lot, anyway, -- Oleg Goldshmidt | p...@goldshmidt.org _______________________________________________ Linux-il mailing list Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
