may i suggest trying a vanilla kernel, for example 2.2 or 2.4 and this patch
http://rick.vanrein.org/linux/badram/index.html

because you mentioned you have a ram with errors.
it seems solid, but i haven't tried it yet.

* - * - *
Tzahi Fadida
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Technion Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - *

WARNING TO SPAMMERS:  see at http://members.lycos.co.uk/my2nis/spamwarning.html

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of 
> Geoffrey S. Mendelson
> Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 10:16 AM
> To: Eliran Gonen
> Cc: Alexander Maryanovsky; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Linux distro for old computers
> 
> 
> Eliran Gonen wrote:
> > 
> > Alexander Maryanovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: 
> > > A friend of mine had her windows (98) die a horrible death and she asked me 
> > > to reinstall it. I told her that I could install a better operating system 
> > > called Linux instead. Now, this would be fine and dandy, as she doesn't 
> ..... 
> > Perhaps RedHat 6.0/6.2 with Gnome 1.4 or Kde 2 ?
> 
> I was recently given a 486/66 that I had nursed along for years as a windows
> computer for a neighbor. They finaly bought a used PII and instead of trashing
> the 486, gave it to me. I found that this particular machine had bad ram and
> a hard drive, but I had both in my junk bin. 
> 
> I installed 32m RAM and and a 1.6 gig hard drive. I looked around for linux
> distros to install on it. I tried RH9, but it took too long to install and
> used to much space. What ever happened to a "minimal" install?
> 
> I've installed RH9 on Pentium I machines 133mHz/32m RAM, but they needed a lot
> more disk space 
> 
> So looking around, I tried to install Redhat 3.0.3, which seemed to be about
> the size I could fit on the hard drive without any extra Disk Manager
> type software. The 486 BIOS was limited to 520meg hard drives 
> 
> I found that 3.0.3 has completly disappeared from all archives. Even a Google
> search found directories, but they were empty 
> 
> So I settled for RedHat 6.2. It installed ok, but the smallest system I
> could make was around 500 meg. Using the boot from a 32m partition trick, I
> was able to get the entire disk work without extra software 
> 
> I then found the following problems:
> 
> 1.  There was no C compiler, The last RedHat packaged C compiler for it was
>     EGCS. Adding EGCS and make and some other tools brought it over 600meg 
> 
> 2.  There was no SSH. I had to compile SSH, which required GCC, so number 1
>     became relevant 
> 
> 3.  There was no SUDO. I had to comiple it from source 
> 
> 4. Every known security hole in Linux from about two years ago was present
>    and NOT fixed. Not a big problem to me, as the machine would always live
>    behind a firewall, but one in the real world required a lot of updates 
> 
> 5. X windows works, but slow. If you remove things like sendmail, and things
>    that might be usefull in the real world, you can get it to run without
>    swapping. 
> 
> This does not count as a RedHat limitation, but the machine had a Tseng Labs
> ET4000 VLB display card with the gigantic (at the time) 1meg of video ram 
> The best I could get out of it was 800x600x8. 
> 
> BTW, I decided to not use Debian as I prefer to download complete ISO
> images instead of using jigdo. 
> 
> Geoff 
> 
> -- 
> Geoffrey S. Mendelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 972-54-608-069
> Do sysadmins count networked sheep?
> 
> =================================================================
> To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
> echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> 


=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to