IIRC, there was a merger of egcs and gcc. this was nearly a couple of years
back. AFAIK, there's gcc 2.95.2 around, and i've stopped CVS'ing gcc loong back
it ain't worth the effort. so if gcc is the final product of the merger, i guess
that'll make egcs look ancient... that may be the cause of the size too... someone
willing to dig up the facts on it? i'm kinda too occupied to search around
sourceware.cygnus.com... :=\
On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 11:17:30PM -0700, Arun Sharma wrote:
>
> The last I heard, compiling with egcs was not supported.
>
I remember having compiled a few kernels of 2.1 using egcs... specifically i
remember 2.1.121 cuz i had sent a patch off fer that...
Nikhil.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
LIH is all for free speech. But it was created for a purpose - to help
people discuss issues about installing and running Linux. If your
messages are counterproductive to this purpose, your privileges to
submit messages can and will be revoked.
