My personal experience with both these MTAs (Qmail and Sendmail) at different sites [dot com, isp, small business segments, highly secure enterprises] has me convinced that Qmail is much much better on various counts. Purely from a technical point of view Qmail outshines Sendmail. I have also installed and seen Qmail performing exceedingly well on FreeBSD machine.
Suresh, I wonder why your office is using such a complicated setup when you could have done it all purely in Qmail? Having said as much I also know that sendmail ***with the right configurations*** would also serve well! RKA > Subject: Re: [LIH] Is qmail better than sendmail ? > Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 03:35:51 -0700 > From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Organization: The International Lumber Cartel of India > To: shyam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > shyam [05/10/01 11:31 +0530]: > > Yahoo uses qmail where as it could have used sendmail. > > Does it mean that qmail is better than sendmail. Is there any way > > (website) about comparision b/w qmail and sendmail > > There are several such - and they will all be mostly by fanatic fans of one > mailserver or the other. Qmail v/s Sendmail is something like vi v/s emacs. > > For what its worth, my current office uses sendmail for incoming mail - this > is handed off to a cluster of qmail machines for delivery. Outgoing mail is > generally qmail. > > -suresh _______________________________________________ linux-india-help mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help
