unsubscibe
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> Send linux-india-help mailing list submissions to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web,
> visit
>
>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body
> 'help' to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it
> is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of linux-india-help digest..."
>
> > Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Problems with mails (Ajitabh Pandey)
> 2. Re: Problems with mails (Suresh
> Ramasubramanian)
> 3. Stuck in 2.4.4 kernel compilation...
> (Amarendra Godbole (Intl Vendor))
> 4. Stuck in kernel compilation... (Harish)
> 5. Re: [ilugd]: KSnuffle Installation problem
> (Varun Varma)
> 6. Need Help for sendmail. (ashish natvarlal
> kuvawala)
> 7. Re: [ale] Stuck in 2.4.4 kernel compilation...
> (James P. Kinney III)
> 8. Re: Re: Dumb Terminals on Linux? (mukund)
> 9. Re: unable to createdb in postgressql (mukund)
> 10. Re: Re: [LIG] Re: what use large machines?
> (mukund)
> 11. Re: IP conflict logged? (mukund)
>
> ATTACHMENT part 3.1 message/rfc822
> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 17:54:27 -0800 (PST)
> From: Ajitabh Pandey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Suresh Ramasubramanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [LIH] Re: Problems with mails
>
> Hi,
>
> I checked but couldn't understand except for the
> fact
> that the mails were queued for delivery to
> ajitabhpandey@localhost. I am attaching the
> /var/log/mail file. I don't have /var/log/maillog
> file.
>
> Also while doing sendmail -bv -v ajitabhpandey
> following output is obtained.
>
> ---------------<snip>-------------------
> ajitabhpandey...WARNING: Cannot open alias database
> /etc/mail/aliases
> reading text version
> ajitabhpandey...deliverable: mailer local, user
> ajitabhpandey
> ---------------</snip>-------------------
> ---------------</var/log/mail>--------------------
> Feb 16 15:48:35 linuxclinic sendmail[21050]:
> starting
> daemon (8.11.1): SMTP+queueing@00:05:00
> Feb 17 14:49:42 linuxclinic sendmail[758]: starting
> daemon (8.11.1): SMTP+queueing@00:05:00
> Feb 17 20:33:41 linuxclinic sendmail[758]: starting
> daemon (8.11.1): SMTP+queueing@00:05:00
> Feb 17 21:32:57 linuxclinic sendmail[1522]: starting
> daemon (8.11.1): SMTP+queueing@00:05:00
> Feb 17 22:08:07 linuxclinic sendmail[2235]:
> g1HGc2j02235: collect: premature EOM: Error 0
> Feb 17 22:08:07 linuxclinic sendmail[2235]:
> g1HGc2j02235: collect: unexpected close on
> connection
> from localhost,
>
sender=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Error 0
> Feb 17 22:08:07 linuxclinic sendmail[2235]:
> g1HGc2j02235:
>
from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> size=22748, class=0, nrcpts=1, proto=ESMTP,
> daemon=MTA, relay=localhost [127.0.0.1]
> Feb 17 22:11:20 linuxclinic sendmail[2320]:
> g1HGeMj02320: collect: premature EOM: Error 0
> Feb 17 22:11:20 linuxclinic sendmail[2320]:
> g1HGeMj02320: collect: unexpected close on
> connection
> from localhost,
>
sender=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Error 0
> Feb 17 22:11:20 linuxclinic sendmail[2320]:
> g1HGeMj02320:
>
from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> size=4396, class=0, nrcpts=1, proto=ESMTP,
> daemon=MTA,
> relay=localhost [127.0.0.1]
> Feb 17 22:15:04 linuxclinic sendmail[758]: starting
> daemon (8.11.1): SMTP+queueing@00:05:00
> Feb 17 22:17:38 linuxclinic sendmail[1205]:
> g1HGlU101205:
>
from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> size=37693, class=-60, nrcpts=1,
>
msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=localhost [127.0.0.1]
> Feb 17 22:17:38 linuxclinic sendmail[1205]:
> g1HGlU101205: to=<ajitabhpandey@localhost>,
> delay=00:00:08, mailer=local, pri=175693,
> stat=queued
> Feb 17 22:17:43 linuxclinic sendmail[1206]:
> g1HGle101206: from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, size=10193,
> class=0, nrcpts=1,
>
msgid=<9110C22331F1D411B6F1008048FBE5DD4F8F02@DEL-SDA-ES1>,
> proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=localhost [127.0.0.1]
> Feb 17 22:17:43 linuxclinic sendmail[1206]:
> g1HGle101206: to=<ajitabhpandey@localhost>,
> delay=00:00:03, mailer=local, pri=40193, stat=queued
> Feb 17 22:17:53 linuxclinic sendmail[1207]:
> g1HGll101207:
>
from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> size=36580, class=-60, nrcpts=1,
>
msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=localhost [127.0.0.1]
> Feb 17 22:17:53 linuxclinic sendmail[1207]:
> g1HGll101207: to=<ajitabhpandey@localhost>,
> delay=00:00:06, mailer=local, pri=174580,
> stat=queued
> Feb 17 22:17:59 linuxclinic sendmail[1211]:
> g1HGlt101211: from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, size=18240,
> class=0, nrcpts=1,
>
msgid=<9110C22331F1D411B6F1008048FBE5DD4F91C4@DEL-SDA-ES1>,
> proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=localhost [127.0.0.1]
> Feb 17 22:17:59 linuxclinic sendmail[1211]:
> g1HGlt101211: to=<ajitabhpandey@localhost>,
> delay=00:00:04, mailer=local, pri=48240, stat=queued
> Feb 17 22:18:08 linuxclinic sendmail[1212]:
> g1HGm2101212:
>
from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> size=36174, class=-60, nrcpts=1,
>
msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=localhost [127.0.0.1]
> Feb 17 22:18:08 linuxclinic sendmail[1212]:
> g1HGm2101212: to=<ajitabhpandey@localhost>,
> delay=00:00:06, mailer=local, pri=174174,
> stat=queued
> Feb 17 22:18:14 linuxclinic sendmail[1213]:
> g1HGmC101213: from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> size=13088, class=0, nrcpts=1,
>
msgid=<LISTMANAGERSQL-8069632-66910-2002.01.31-19.49.58--ajitabhpandey#[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=localhost [127.0.0.1]
> Feb 17 22:18:14 linuxclinic sendmail[1213]:
> g1HGmC101213: to=<ajitabhpandey@localhost>,
> delay=00:00:02, mailer=local, pri=43088, stat=queued
> Feb 17 22:18:24 linuxclinic sendmail[1214]:
> g1HGmH101214:
>
from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> size=36182, class=-60, nrcpts=1,
>
msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, r .............
>
> ---------------</var/log/mail>--------------------
> --- Suresh Ramasubramanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > +++ Ajitabh Pandey [linux-india] <18/02/02 00:35
> > -0800>:
> > > When I carefully checked the mutt opening
> screen,
> > I
> > > found that it was giving no mailbox for the user
> > on
> > > the bottom most line.
> > > I checked /var/spool/mail and found that in
> > Caldera it
> >
> > Look at /var/log/maillog, then try
> >
> > $ sendmail -bv -v ajitabh (or whatever your local
> > login is)
> >
> > -srs
> >
> > --
> > Suresh Ramasubramanian <----> mallet <at> efn
> dot
> > org
> > EMail Sturmbannfuhrer, Lower Middle Class Unix
> > Sysadmin
> > [Linux One Stanza Tip] From :
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > LOST #060 -**< Sub : Procmail recipe for OE Worms
> > >**-
> > Several M$ worms like SirCam, CodeRed use a
> dummied
> > multi part
> > OE boundary, starting with an underscore (
> _Outlook_
> > ... ) . A
> > procmail recipe to segregate mail with such
> payload:
> > * ^Content-Type:
> > *
> >
>
multipart.*"----[A-F0-9]+_Outlook_Express_message_boundary"
> > /home/{user}/mail/danger_here
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games
> http://sports.yahoo.com
>
>
> ATTACHMENT part 3.2 message/rfc822
> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 10:18:07 +0800
> From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Organization: Hopelessly Disorganized
> Subject: [LIH] Re: Problems with mails
>
> +++ Ajitabh Pandey [linux-india] <18/02/02 17:54
> -0800>:
> > I checked but couldn't understand except for the
> fact
> > that the mails were queued for delivery to
> > ajitabhpandey@localhost. I am attaching the
> > /var/log/mail file. I don't have /var/log/maillog
> > file.
>
> Do a mailq... then check permissions on wherever
> your mail spool is located
> (1777, ideally).
>
> > Also while doing sendmail -bv -v ajitabhpandey
> > following output is obtained.
> > ajitabhpandey...WARNING: Cannot open alias
> database
> > /etc/mail/aliases
>
> so run "newaliases"
>
> > reading text version
> > ajitabhpandey...deliverable: mailer local, user
> > ajitabhpandey
>
> Yeah - so it should deliver to user ajitabhpandey -
> unless your mail spool
> permissions are screwed so that the mail is received
> but never delivered.
>
> -srs
> --
> Suresh Ramasubramanian <----> mallet <at> efn dot
> org
> EMail Sturmbannfuhrer, Lower Middle Class Unix
> Sysadmin
> [Linux One Stanza Tip] From : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> LOST #111 -**< Sub : Sysadmin jobs (changing boot
> message) >**-
> To change the message which greets you before the
> login prompt
> appears, as root, edit the file /etc/motd ... FYI,
> motd stands
> for Message Of The Day !
>
>
> ATTACHMENT part 3.3 message/rfc822
> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 09:28:33 +0530
> From: "Amarendra Godbole (Intl Vendor)"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [LIH] Stuck in 2.4.4 kernel compilation...
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I have RHL 7.2 with 2.4.7 kernel. I have to put in
> 2.4.4 kernel. So I
> got the source for 2.4.4 downloaded, and followed
> the regular steps to
> compile it. Now, I used the old configuration file
> (make oldconfig).
>
> The compilation went thru fine, I did boot into it,
> but... eth0 did not
> come up. Some googling told me that, the following
> options were not set
> in the .config file CONFIG_NETLINK,
> CONFIG_NETFILTER. I did a manual
> edit and set them right (=y).
>
> But now the compilation does not go thru, I get an
> error (NF_MAX_HOOKS
> not declared) in netfilter.c and it bails out.
> Also, the README
> mentions that to compile this kernel, one should
> have gcc-2.91.66, while
> version I have is 2.96.
>
> Can this difference in gcc may cause the problem ?
> Or did I go wrong in
> manually editing the .config file ? How do I get
> this kernel to compile
> with eth0 up ?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Cheers,
> --amar
>
> --
> Amarendra A. Godbole / Microsoft ``Services For
> UNIX'' / These opinions
> are _MINE_.
> If you miss love, you miss life.
>
>
>
> ATTACHMENT part 3.4 message/rfc822
> From: "Harish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [LIH] Stuck in kernel compilation...
> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 09:52:34 +0530
>
> i have a problem with the isapnp card after
> compiling the kernel....
> when i try to configure the sound card which SB16 i
> get an error message
> sayin the soundcore module is not present in the
> kernel... but i did include
> the modules during the "make menuconfig"
>
> can anyone throw some light on this issue???
> rgrds
> harish
>
>
>
> ATTACHMENT part 3.5 message/rfc822
> From: "Varun Varma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 04:53:26 +0530
> Organization: Mindframe Software And Services Pvt.
> Ltd.
> Subject: [LIH] Re: [ilugd]: KSnuffle Installation
> problem
>
> Dear Yashpal,
>
> The ksnuffle distribution seems to be broken. Here
> is what I had to do on a
> RedHat 7.1 system, to get ksnuffle-2.2 working:
>
> Edit the following two the files under
> /where_ever_you_unpack/ksnuffle-2.2ksnuffle/:
>
> knd_pcap.h
> pktinfo.h
>
> In both of these, locate the following line
>
> #include <sys/time.h>
>
> and ADD the following line after the previous line:
>
> #include <time.h>
>
> So the edited files should now contain a section
> like:
>
> #include <sys/time.h>
> #include <time.h>
>
> That gets them compiled and ready to go!
>
> You would of-course need to make sure the KDE
> development libraries are
> present.
>
> Haven't investigated the source of these problems,
> but this seems to get it
> working just fine...
>
> Regards,
> -Varun
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Yashpal Nagar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 4:22 PM
> Subject: [ilugd]: KSnuffle Installation problem
>
>
> > Hi All,
> > I am installing ksnuffle which is a network
> packet sniffer for KDE.
> > I have downloaded both binary & even source from
> the site
> > http://www.quaking.demon.co.uk/ksnuffle.html
> > None of one is compiling nor installing on Redhat
> 7.1
> > rpm package looks for following libs
> >
> > error: failed dependencies:
> > libkdefakes.so.0 is needed by
> ksnuffle-2.2-1
> > libz.so.1 is needed by ksnuffle-2.2-1
> > although both file are in /usr/lib only i create
> sym link for libkdefakes
> i.e
> > ln -s /usr/lib/libkdefakes.so.0
> /usr/lib/libkdefakes.so.3.0.0
> > But now luck.
> >
> > While compling from source gives this prob..,
> > knd_pcapmon.cpp:251: `localtime' undeclared (first
> use this function)
> > knd_pcapmon.cpp:251: (Each undeclared identifier
> is reported only once
> > for each function it appears in.)
> > knd_pcapmon.cpp:251: `strftime' undeclared (first
> use this function)
> > make[2]: *** [knd_pcapmon.o] Error 1
> > make[2]: Leaving directory
> `/root/ksnuffle-2.1/ksnuffle'
> > make[1]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1
> > make[1]: Leaving directory
> `/root/ksnuffle-2.1/ksnuffle'
> > make: *** [install-recursive] Error 1
> >
> > every distribution 2.0,2.1,2.2 of ksnuffle ,i
> tried ALL but no one is
> > successful.
> >
> > Is there anyone who has successfully installed
> ksnuffle or tell something
> > other than that packet sniffer.
> > Please help,
> >
> > Regards
> > -Yash
> >
> >
> ================================================
> > To subscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with subscribe in
> subject header
> > To unsubscribe, send email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe in
> subject header
> > Archives are available at
> http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd%40wpaa.org
> >
> =================================================
> >
>
>
>
>
> ATTACHMENT part 3.6 message/rfc822
> Date: 19 Feb 2002 04:26:08 -0000
> From: "ashish natvarlal kuvawala"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-to: "ashish natvarlal kuvawala"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "LIH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [LIH] Need Help for sendmail.
>
>
> Hi!
>
> I have an aix server running old sendmail version.
> the sendmail.cf is in the following format.
>
> # level 6 config file format
> V6/Berkeley
>
> I want my server only rely for couple of domains and
> eg. linux.mspl.com and magnamious.com and deny rest.
> how this can be acomplished or is there any document
> for older versions which i can refer for this and
> where i can find the same .
>
> waiting for your reply.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ashish.
>
>
>
> ATTACHMENT part 3.7 message/rfc822
> From: "James P. Kinney III"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Amarendra "Godbole (Intl Vendor)"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: 18 Feb 2002 23:20:10 -0500
> Subject: [LIH] Re: [ale] Stuck in 2.4.4 kernel
> compilation...
>
> I must ask, why the downgrade to 2.4.4? It was not a
> particularly
> noteworthy kernel. 2.4.9 is the last kernel before a
> major vm code
> change.
>
> One thing you did not mention was the procedure you
> followed _after_ the
> manual edit. You will need to do a make dep again.
> Then the make bzImage
> ...
>
> Normally, I will do a test compile on a custom
> config. If it make OK,
> I'll copy out the .config to a file elsewhere and
> the do a make
> mrproper. This will do a full clean of all links and
> build parts. Copy
> back the .config and do make oldconfig, make dep,
> make bzImage. I run a
> patched XFS-enabled kernel, so I don't run the stock
> RedHat kernels
> after an install.
>
> Also, you could install the new redhat kernel
> upgrade rpm. It will allow
> the rpm upgrade of several X packages for some
> better support and
> performance.
>
> Also, some of the driver parts change names a bit.
> It may be needed to
> do a make menuconfig or make xconfig to select your
> net cards with a
> different kernel.
>
> On Mon, 2002-02-18 at 22:58, Amarendra Godbole (Intl
> Vendor) wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I have RHL 7.2 with 2.4.7 kernel. I have to put in
> 2.4.4 kernel. So I
> > got the source for 2.4.4 downloaded, and followed
> the regular steps to
> > compile it. Now, I used the old configuration file
> (make oldconfig).
> >
> > The compilation went thru fine, I did boot into
> it, but... eth0 did not
> > come up. Some googling told me that, the following
> options were not set
> > in the .config file CONFIG_NETLINK,
> CONFIG_NETFILTER. I did a manual
> > edit and set them right (=y).
> >
> > But now the compilation does not go thru, I get an
> error (NF_MAX_HOOKS
> > not declared) in netfilter.c and it bails out.
> Also, the README
> > mentions that to compile this kernel, one should
> have gcc-2.91.66, while
> > version I have is 2.96.
> >
> > Can this difference in gcc may cause the problem ?
> Or did I go wrong in
> > manually editing the .config file ? How do I get
> this kernel to compile
> > with eth0 up ?
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > --amar
> >
> > --
> > Amarendra A. Godbole / Microsoft ``Services For
> UNIX'' / These opinions
> > are _MINE_.
> > If you miss love, you miss life.
> >
> >
> > ---
> > This message has been sent through the ALE general
> discussion list.
> > See http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for
> more info. Problems should be
> > sent to listmaster at ale dot org.
> >
> --
> James P. Kinney III \Changing the mobile computing
> world/
> President and COO \ one Linux user
> /
> Local Net Solutions,LLC \ at a time.
> /
> 770-493-8244
> \.___________________________./
>
> GPG ID: 829C6CA7 James P. Kinney III (M.S. Physics)
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Fingerprint = 3C9E 6366 54FC A3FE BA4D 0659 6190
> ADC3 829C 6CA7
>
>
>
> ATTACHMENT part 3.7.2 application/pgp-signature
name=signature.asc
> ATTACHMENT part 3.8 message/rfc822
> From: "mukund" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "LIH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [LIH] Re: Dumb Terminals on Linux?
> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 09:59:29 +0530
>
>
>
> >On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 04:31:00PM +0800, Suresh
> Ramasubramanian wrote:
> >> +++ Ajay [linux-india] <18/02/02 09:56 +0530>:
> >> > Is it possible to connect dumb terminals to
> Linux box whereby
> >> > the terminals share the processing power of the
> Linux server?
> >> > I heard that its possible in Unix.. though
> haven't used Unix.
> >>
>
>
> Etherboot but with EPROM on network card not with
> bios.
> Regards,
> Mukund Deshmukh
> Beta Computronics Pvt. Ltd.
> Web site - http://betacomp.com
>
>
>
>
>
> ATTACHMENT part 3.9 message/rfc822
> From: "mukund" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "lih" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [LIH] unable to createdb in postgressql
> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 10:01:02 +0530
>
> You must be trying with root user.
> Just su postgres and then use createdb.
> Regards,
> Mukund Deshmukh
> Beta Computronics Pvt. Ltd.
> Web site - http://betacomp.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: amol g <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: lih <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Monday, February 18, 2002 11:37 AM
> Subject: [LIH] unable to createdb in postgressql
>
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >Iamtrying to create a db in postgresql.
> >I get this error setuserid user <user> is not in
> >'pgshadow'
> >
> >Bye,
> >Amol
> >
> >__________________________________________________
> >Do You Yahoo!?
> >Got something to say? Say it better with Yahoo!
> Video Mail
> >http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >linux-india-help mailing list
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help
> >
>
>
>
>
> ATTACHMENT part 3.10 message/rfc822
> From: "mukund" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [LIH] Re: [LIG] Re: what use large
> machines?
> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 10:23:41 +0530
>
> VSN has the stupid way of achieving this.
> They simply add another server with raid, mail, user
> management, etc etc
> when the number of user exceeds 20,000.
> The bom1,bom2,.... are result of this.
> vsnl.net is only a front end to these server.
>
> Regards,
> Mukund Deshmukh
> Beta Computronics Pvt. Ltd.
> Web site - http://betacomp.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Monday, February 18, 2002 8:44 PM
> Subject: [LIH] Re: [LIG] Re: what use large
> machines?
>
>
> >
> >> However, one large box doesn't scale well at all,
> beyond a point. Cost
> >wise,
> >> resource wise, maintainablity wise. Even if you
> get yourself a huge big
> >sun
> >> box ... you have one single point of failure.
> >
> >for a LIVE example, have a look at vsnl.net (not
> sure about vsnl.in though)
> >
> >it's crazy slow at times, for that very reason, i
> believe.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >linux-india-help mailing list
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help
> >
>
>
>
>
> ATTACHMENT part 3.11 message/rfc822
> From: "mukund" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "LIH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [LIH] IP conflict logged?
> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 10:19:02 +0530
>
> The dhcp can allot IP if the request comes to dhcp,
> if the user changes to
> fixed IP then dhcp does not have any role to play.
>
> I have done similar thing but for the squid.
> 1. All the traffic coming from local LAN is
> transferred to a daemon (port
> 80) using IP tables.
> 2. The daemon puts up a login screen to user. The
> user (on win machine)
> enters a username/password.
> 3. If the user name and password are correct, the
> entry in IP tables is
> removed, and user can browse through proxy only.
>
> You may similar thing.
> Regards,
> Mukund Deshmukh
> Beta Computronics Pvt. Ltd.
> Web site - http://betacomp.com
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sagar Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Praveen B.Sundaram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: lih <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> blug
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Monday, February 18, 2002 5:11 PM
> Subject: [LIH] IP conflict logged?
>
>
> >We do have a setup of 450 computers around. There
> are many servers on my
> >network. Even many developers require static IP for
> their machines. We have
> >too many static IPs. I have alloted Dynamic IP
> range for my VPN clients,
> >static for some but still do you think it is
> possible to stop people in
> >win95/98/2000 with administrator password to stop
> changing the ip's of
> >their machine even if I use static IPs by fixing
> thier IP addresses in my
> >DHCP server as I have put up firewalls and access
> restrictions using
> >iptables etc?
> >
> >I dont think so!
> >
> >and above all I wanted the name to the log file in
> Linux which logs IP
> >conflicts!
> >
> >Thanks for the response!
> >
> >Sagar Srivastava
> >CWLGlobal, Bangalore
> >
> >> <<<Snip>>
> >> People keep changing their
> >> IPs and sometimes there is a conflict with my
> linux servers, how can I
> >find
> >> out the MAC address of the culprit?
> >>
> >> <<Snip>>
> >>
> >> hey why dont you use DHCP??
> >> i thought you guys had a fairly large setup
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >>
> >> Praveen B.Sundaram
> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >> Pixel Computers
> >> http://pixelconsulting.net
> >> Phone : +91-80-3318661
> >> Fax : +91-80-3318662
> >> Cell : 98450 - 108-54
> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >linux-india-help mailing list
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> > _______________________________________________
> linux-india-help mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games
http://sports.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
linux-india-help mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help
