> Hmm.. IIRC that's CPU dependent limit and in linux arena processes are as
heavy
> as threads so you don't need to put everything in threads.. Anyway that's
OT
> for this thread..(Yaah and I doubt that 2MB stack per thread cause much
damage
> on 64 bit. Is that 1024 limit on 32 bit archs?)

yups.

> Evaluate before you deploy and here he has chance to do that. What's wrong
with
> suggesting an evaluation?
>

Nothing. :)

So long as the suggestion is not in the tune of xyz is way better than
abc.RedHat is not quite stable, agreed. But I would disagree about the easy
maintenance part. :)

It is all dependent on the sysadmin's skills rather than a particular
flavour. Instead of encourgaing new/inexperienced sysadmins to go for a
flavour that will make it easier for them to do their job(and thus depriving
them on an incentive to ever start looking below the hood) we ought to be
telling them to upgrade their skills rather.

The redhat service tip was never intended as a merit of RedHat... It is just
there ... and since he is using redhat, it would be a good idea to use it.
:)

Fire and Forget, is never an option for a sysadmin. :)

You have to keep yourself updated and informed at all times.
And it really helps to upgrade one's skills.

Wouldn't you agree ? :)

Regards,
Abhi


_______________________________________________________________

Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
linux-india-help mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help

Reply via email to