Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jujubhs) [Saturday, August 17, 2002 9:11 PM]: > > > >>Which I meant is let the program maintain the log file in its own way, >>which is safe and will eliminate the corruption. And while using pipes >>where does the file comes into picture, think!!! >> >> > >And basically rewrite all the functionality of syslog? > It is not about syslog, syslog what does it do? Can the syslog program(just that alone) will it help you write the data analysed and modified to database? Well what if you want to write a module that talks to some odd database which apache cannot talk to, or do anything funny .
> > >>Why people always tend to to find mistake, if it is meaning full use it >>or else enhance it. >> >> > >Supposing it is not meaningful? > > -srs > Did you understand the phrase? if you did then you know the answer otherwise, well what the heck, it is your choice. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 _______________________________________________ linux-india-help mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help
