On Friday, March 21, 2003 4:03 PM [GMT+0530=IST],
Sukrit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Having said all that, debian retains a lot of control itself. i don't
> like, use and/or understand debconf. i prefer to do things the
> emacs/zile way.
better in fact.
> Slackware i haven't tried before <hint, hint>, though i understand
> that there isn't a packaging system per se and that you compile
it has a quite powerful and flexible package mgmt system. what's even
better is that you can compile packages to suit your processor ... try
autoslack.
> What do you people think is a more widely used distribution in
> production enviornemnts?
we use rh 7.3 very extensively.
> Anything can be made secure with a bit of toil but what works for you,
> especially when you consider updates and security patches?
rh up2date is pretty good actually
srs
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
linux-india-help mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help
