On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 13:42:51 +0530, "Suresh Ramasubramanian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Shridhar Daithankar [8/29/2003 1:00 PM] : > > > On 29 Aug 2003 at 12:36, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > >>Try "tux" - I think it is a webserver compiled into the kernel. Does > >>zero copy, and has some things like serving cache friendly headers. > > > > That's gone with 2.6 IIRC. It was a caching architecture in kernel in additon > > to apache. Or was it khttpd. > > Pity - it was rather neat. tux is being used by us with thttpd in order > to serve static content (images etc).
How well does thttpd scale with boa or tux? I use thttpd for serving images, and it works great on the freebsd box on which it is installed, but I've never had to deal with too much traffic to really stretch it. I've seen teh benchmarks at the thttpd site, but then, impartial would be better. cheers -- Sthitaprajna [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.fastmail.fm - The way an email service should be ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ linux-india-help mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help
