--- Suresh Ramasubramanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. rack space costs (NAS / SAN devices typically have far lower form > factor > than if you try to run a bunch of fileservers across to a datacenter) I was thinking more about the SOHO users before targeting big companies. > 2. out of the box and just works - most of the time. you don't have to > sacrifice white chickens and mutter incantations all the time like > you > would with a homecooked solution If the technology is stable I don't see why it cant be achieved. > 3. hot swappable modules in your NAS / SAN Hmm I am not sure how easy it is have a custom built hot-swappable SCSI drive based setup in Delhi. Of course the cabinet is the biggest problem at the moment. > 4. lots and lots more redundancy and failover built in > > 5. A SLA with your vendor that you can enforce if things turn out bad If you have any plans for setting up a business I don't see a reason why you shouldn't agree to have a SLA. For me making money is not important. It is more of saving money for personal use. I would like to be able to do it for the sake of doing it. Mithun __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ linux-india-help mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help
