Folks,
This is not meant to start a bloody war, but just for information, which
MUA is better, pine or elm. I do
bash$ ls -l `which pine elm`
-rwxr-sr-x 1 root mail 301588 Dec 12 1995 /usr/bin/elm
-rwxrwxr-x 1 root bin 1188816 May 5 1999 /usr/bin/pine
Ooops, pine is nearly 4 times in size than elm. Personally, i have always
been using pine. Is there anything which pine provides, and elm does
not? Or do i need to recompile my pine (but both already use the same
libraries).
bash$ ldd `which pine elm`
/usr/bin/pine:
libtermcap.so.2 => /lib/libtermcap.so.2.0.8
libc.so.5 => /lib/libc.so.5.3.12
/usr/bin/elm:
libtermcap.so.2 => /lib/libtermcap.so.2.0.8
libc.so.5 => /lib/libc.so.5.3.12
Why is pine so memory thirsty?
Sharad.
-=-=-=-=-=-
--------------------------------------------------------------------
The Linux India Mailing List Archives are now available. Please search
the archive at http://lists.linux-india.org/ before posting your question
to avoid repetition and save bandwidth.
