Hi,
>>"Arun" == Arun Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Arun> QT 2.x is released under QPL (http://www.troll.no/qpl/)
Arun> It meets the open source definition http://www.opensource.org/osd.html,
Arun> but not Debian free software guidelines (someone correct me if I'm
Arun> wrong here on DFSG)
Actually, unless they chenged things recently (which_would_
surprise me), the OSD was a copy of the DFSG, which has not changed
since its inception.
As far as I recall discussions in debian-legal, we did agree
that QT 2.X was DFSG free. There were issues with KDE being dependent
on older QT libs, and I have a vague feeling that tere are issues
with KDE and QT 2.x still, modulo a rider being added to the licence
for KDE (I understand that QT2, while DFSG free, is still not GPL
compatible).
Unless things change, Debian is unlikely to ship with KDE.
Of course, since I have been off site for the last 5 weeks
(which is when I last touched base with debian-legal), I could be mis
remembering stuff.
manoj
--
Woke up this morning, don't believe what I saw. Hundred billion
bottles washed up on the shore. Seems I'm not alone in being
alone. Hundred billion castaways looking for a call. The Police,
"Message in a Bottle"
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C fingerprint = 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--------------------------------------------------------------------
The Linux India Mailing List Archives are now available. Please search
the archive at http://lists.linux-india.org/ before posting your question
to avoid repetition and save bandwidth.
