You can probably sustain this argument in a LUG meeting, but not in front
of a general technical audience.
On Fri, Dec 17, 1999 at 10:32:00AM +0530, Jiju Thomas Mathew wrote:
>
> some other points (which I found useful)
> 1. Illegal operations Windows got it
> Linux no
Linux has SIGBUS.
> 2. Registry corruption Windows cannot do with out it
> never heard of this prob
If you let the rpm installations screw with files in /etc, you'd get the
same result. There are both advantages to centralization and a per application
$HOME/.foorc or /etc/foorc file.
I'd like to set my personal profile up in one place, rather than having
the same information replicated in 10 different mail clients.
> 3. Defragmentation of swap heavy and affects system perf swap
> is a drive which fresh on each session
I'm not aware of this particular issue. Do you have a reference to how
Windows NT manages swap ?
> 4. Cluster utilization 4k with fat32 and 32k with
> fat16 1k to 4k per inode
I'm sure this is not a problem with NTFS.
> 5. services poor
> unlimited
Care to elaborate ?
>
> skim thru the jpeg cards i have souped up at digitel.webjump.com/cards.htm
> and find the suitable ones to emphasise ur points.
>
I like the cards though :)
-Arun
--------------------------------------------------------------------
The Linux India Mailing List Archives are now available. Please search
the archive at http://lists.linux-india.org/ before posting your question
to avoid repetition and save bandwidth.
