[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > i tried on linux ver 4.2 > j=4*5*6 was the answer i got. > also logically it is the correct answer. > i cannot say about linux 6.2 > Geethalakshmi Shouldn't the 'logically correct' answer have been j=6*5*4 rather than 4*5*6 ? -------------------------------------------------------------------- The Linux India Mailing List Archives are now available. Please search the archive at http://lists.linux-india.org/ before posting your question to avoid repetition and save bandwidth.
- Re: [LI] mouse pointer Rohit
- Re: [LI] mouse pointer S.Krishna
- [LI] j = ++i * ++i * ++i Aseem Rane
- Re: [LI] j = ++i * ++i * ++i Binand Raj S.
- Re: [LI] j = ++i * ++i * ++i Aseem Rane
- RE: [LI] j = ++i * ++i * ++i Urmil Parikh
- RE: [LI] j = ++i * ++i * ... SHRIDHAR N. DAITHANKAR
- RE: [LI] j = ++i * ++i * ... Urmil Parikh
- Re: [LI] j = ++i * ++i * ++i Rohit
- Re: [LI] j = ++i * ++i * ++i geetha
- Re: [LI] j = ++i * ++i * ++i Rohit
- Re: [LI] j = ++i * ++i * ++i Shourya Sarcar
- Re: [LI] j = ++i * ++i * ++i Arun Sharma
- Re: [LI] j = ++i * ++i * ++i SHRIDHAR N. DAITHANKAR
- [LI] Am I close ?? Shourya Sarcar
- Re: [LI] Am I close ?? SHRIDHAR N. DAITHANKAR
- [LI] Linux Course at Goa Univ... Gurunandan R. Bhat
- [LI] j = ++i * ++i * ++i Raj Mathur
- Re: [LI] j = ++i * ++i * ++i Pramode.C.E
- Re: [LI] mouse pointer Archan Paul