Yep. That is what generally everybody does.
order hosts, bind
You were talking about Domain Name "Server" config, which is not the case here.
These two things are two different entities.
- Gaurav
"Nagarjuna G." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 01/21/2000 08:15:59 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Gaurav Sabharwal/HSS)
Subject: Re: [LI] (Repost) DNS : Logical query
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
->
->
->/etc/hosts is sufficient in a small network. What do you do when you have 1000
->plus hetrogenous machines in your network. One has to opt for either DNS or
DHCP
->in this case.
->
->The order in the host.conf file is just for the machine on which you are
working
->to know the order in which it should resolve hostnames and not related with
DNS
->server configuration at all.
->
I am confused. Cant we say through the /etc/host.conf that first
finish resolving the private things throug the /etc/host and only then
go for bind, thus to DNS.
Nagarjuna
--------------------------------------------------------------------
The Linux India Mailing List Archives are now available. Please search
the archive at http://lists.linux-india.org/ before posting your question
to avoid repetition and save bandwidth.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
The Linux India Mailing List Archives are now available. Please search
the archive at http://lists.linux-india.org/ before posting your question
to avoid repetition and save bandwidth.
