On Sun, 15 Jul 2007, federico ferri wrote:
>>
> (I can imagine it could be done via a /proc/sysrq-keycode virtual file,
> but that's just one possibility)
>
> So, this should turn into a feature request...
> would you accept feature requests? ( :
Well, this is totally untested, and I won't guarantee that this works at
all, but this is how to generally do these kinds of things..
Linus
---
drivers/char/keyboard.c | 6 +++++-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/keyboard.c b/drivers/char/keyboard.c
index 90965b4..e21f52b 100644
--- a/drivers/char/keyboard.c
+++ b/drivers/char/keyboard.c
@@ -157,6 +157,10 @@ static int sysrq_alt_use;
#endif
static int sysrq_alt;
+static int sysrq_key = KEY_SYSRQ;
+module_param_named(sysrq_key, sysrq_key, uint, 0644);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(sysrq_key, "The keycode to be used for sysrq");
+
/*
* Translation of scancodes to keycodes. We set them on only the first
* keyboard in the list that accepts the scancode and keycode.
@@ -1139,7 +1143,7 @@ static void kbd_keycode(unsigned int keycode, int down,
int hw_raw)
printk(KERN_WARNING "keyboard.c: can't emulate
rawmode for keycode %d\n", keycode);
#ifdef CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ /* Handle the SysRq Hack */
- if (keycode == KEY_SYSRQ && (sysrq_down || (down == 1 && sysrq_alt))) {
+ if (keycode == sysrq_key && (sysrq_down || (down == 1 && sysrq_alt))) {
if (!sysrq_down) {
sysrq_down = down;
sysrq_alt_use = sysrq_alt;
