Hi David,

> hid-picolcd and hid-wiimote do not allow any of hidinput, hiddev or hidraw
> to claim the device but still want to remain on the bus. Hence, if a
> driver uses the raw_event callback but no listener claimed the device, we
> still leave it on the bus as the driver probably handles everything by
> itself.
> 
> Under some circumstances (eg., hidinput_connect() fails and raw_event set)
> a device may not be left on the bus even though it has no listeners. But
> then if hidinput_connect() fails there are bigger issues than a device
> that is left unhandled. So we can safely use this heuristic to avoid
> adding another flag for special devices like hid-picolcd and hid-wiimote.
> 
> This also removes the ugly hack from hid-picolcd as this is no longer
> required.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Herrmann <dh.herrm...@googlemail.com>
> ---
> Hi Jiri
> 
> I posted another patchset that introduced HID_CLAIMED_OTHER to avoid this
> heuristic but Henrik convinced me that this trivial check is the cleaner and
> less intrusive implementation. If you're interested, the old patchset was 
> here:
>   http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.input/25945
> 
> Henrik, can you add your signed-off-by as this was your idea?

Gladly, but I would like to change the wording slightly, since a driver
with raw_event set is a listener, and we are still bailing out if
there are no listeners at all. The title is thus misleading.

> 
> Thanks
> David
> 
>  drivers/hid/hid-core.c    | 8 ++++++--
>  drivers/hid/hid-picolcd.c | 4 ----
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
> index 9cdc74e..83ca3ba 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
> @@ -1373,8 +1373,12 @@ int hid_connect(struct hid_device *hdev, unsigned int 
> connect_mask)
>       if ((connect_mask & HID_CONNECT_HIDRAW) && !hidraw_connect(hdev))
>               hdev->claimed |= HID_CLAIMED_HIDRAW;
>  
> -     if (!hdev->claimed) {
> -             hid_err(hdev, "claimed by neither input, hiddev nor hidraw\n");
> +     /* There are device drivers that do not allow hidinput, hiddev or
> +      * hidraw to be connected but still want to remain on the bus. We
> +      * require that these devices use the raw_event callback. Otherwise, we
> +      * simply remove them from the bus if no listener claimed them. */

How about "Drivers using raw_event() are not required to connect to anything 
else"?

> +     if (!hdev->claimed && !hdev->driver->raw_event) {
> +             hid_err(hdev, "device has no listeners, quitting\n");
>               return -ENODEV;
>       }
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-picolcd.c b/drivers/hid/hid-picolcd.c
> index 45c3433..74c388d 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-picolcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-picolcd.c
> @@ -2613,11 +2613,7 @@ static int picolcd_probe(struct hid_device *hdev,
>               goto err_cleanup_data;
>       }
>  
> -     /* We don't use hidinput but hid_hw_start() fails if nothing is
> -      * claimed. So spoof claimed input. */
> -     hdev->claimed = HID_CLAIMED_INPUT;
>       error = hid_hw_start(hdev, 0);
> -     hdev->claimed = 0;
>       if (error) {
>               hid_err(hdev, "hardware start failed\n");
>               goto err_cleanup_data;
> -- 
> 1.7.11.2
> 

Thanks,
Henrik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to