> > The vendor's name is "ThingM" and the product's name is "blink(1)", > > not "blink". > > Given that, would you prefer to keep "blink(1)::1234", or would it > > rather be > > "thingm-blink1::1234" (avoiding parenthesis)? > > > > I ask the same question for the driver name, which is actually > > "blink(1)". > > Actually, for HID bus drivers, we are mostly following the convention > of > having just the vendor name in the driver, see hid-microsoft, > hid-logitech, etc. > > So it'd make most sense to me to name the driver hid-thingm, and in > case > it is driving blink(1) device (no other devices will be driven by it > currently), let it create /sys/class/leds/blink1...
Ok, makes sense to me! Thanks, Vivien -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
