On 05/27/2013 08:11 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> From: Pantelis Antoniou <[email protected]>
> 
Some confusing splitting between this and the previous patch that definitely 
wants
to be cleaned up.

> Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c           |   26 +++++++++++++++++---------
>  drivers/input/touchscreen/ti_am335x_tsc.c |   13 ++++++++++---
>  drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c            |    1 +
>  3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c
> index cceff09..72ffe89 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c
> @@ -25,7 +25,9 @@
>  #include <linux/of_device.h>
>  #include <linux/iio/machine.h>
>  #include <linux/iio/driver.h>
> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
>  
> +#include <linux/io.h>
That only went away in the previous patch...

>  #include <linux/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.h>
>  
>  struct tiadc_device {
> @@ -37,13 +39,17 @@ struct tiadc_device {
>  
>  static unsigned int tiadc_readl(struct tiadc_device *adc, unsigned int reg)
>  {
> -     return readl(adc->mfd_tscadc->tscadc_base + reg);
> +     unsigned int val;
> +
> +     val = (unsigned int)-1;
> +     regmap_read(adc->mfd_tscadc->regmap_tscadc, reg, &val);
> +     return val;
>  }
>  
>  static void tiadc_writel(struct tiadc_device *adc, unsigned int reg,
>                                       unsigned int val)
>  {
> -     writel(val, adc->mfd_tscadc->tscadc_base + reg);
> +     regmap_write(adc->mfd_tscadc->regmap_tscadc, reg, val);
>  }
>  
>  static void tiadc_step_config(struct tiadc_device *adc_dev)
> @@ -76,22 +82,24 @@ static void tiadc_step_config(struct tiadc_device 
> *adc_dev)
>       tiadc_writel(adc_dev, REG_SE, STPENB_STEPENB);
>  }
>  
> -static int tiadc_channel_init(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, int channels)
> +static int tiadc_channel_init(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> +             struct tiadc_device *adc_dev)
>  {
>       struct iio_chan_spec *chan_array;
>       struct iio_chan_spec *chan;
>       char *s;
>       int i, len, size, ret;
> +     int channels = adc_dev->channels;
This is an unconnected bit of cleanup.  If you want it put it in the previous 
patch
which only just introduced what you are changing.
>  
> -     size = indio_dev->num_channels * (sizeof(struct iio_chan_spec) + 6);
> +     size = channels * (sizeof(struct iio_chan_spec) + 6);
>       chan_array = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
>       if (chan_array == NULL)
>               return -ENOMEM;
>  
>       /* buffer space is after the array */
> -     s = (char *)(chan_array + indio_dev->num_channels);
> +     s = (char *)(chan_array + channels);
>       chan = chan_array;
> -     for (i = 0; i < indio_dev->num_channels; i++, chan++, s += len + 1) {
> +     for (i = 0; i < channels; i++, chan++, s += len + 1) {
>  
>               len = sprintf(s, "AIN%d", i);
>  
> @@ -107,8 +115,9 @@ static int tiadc_channel_init(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, 
> int channels)
>       }
>  
>       indio_dev->channels = chan_array;
> +     indio_dev->num_channels = channels;
>  
> -     size = (indio_dev->num_channels + 1) * sizeof(struct iio_map);
> +     size = (channels + 1) * sizeof(struct iio_map);
>       adc_dev->map = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
>       if (adc_dev->map == NULL) {
>               kfree(chan_array);
> @@ -214,7 +223,7 @@ static int tiadc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>       tiadc_step_config(adc_dev);
>  
> -     err = tiadc_channel_init(indio_dev, adc_dev->channels);
> +     err = tiadc_channel_init(indio_dev, adc_dev);
>       if (err < 0)
>               goto err_free_device;
>  
> @@ -223,7 +232,6 @@ static int tiadc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>               goto err_free_channels;
>  
>       platform_set_drvdata(pdev, indio_dev);
> -
>       return 0;
>  
>  err_free_channels:
> diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/ti_am335x_tsc.c 
> b/drivers/input/touchscreen/ti_am335x_tsc.c
> index b467196..0dbf3df 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/ti_am335x_tsc.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/ti_am335x_tsc.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
>  #include <linux/delay.h>
>  #include <linux/of.h>
>  #include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
>  
>  #include <linux/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.h>
>  
> @@ -65,13 +66,17 @@ struct titsc {
>  
>  static unsigned int titsc_readl(struct titsc *ts, unsigned int reg)
>  {
> -     return readl(ts->mfd_tscadc->tscadc_base + reg);
> +     unsigned int val;
> +
> +     val = (unsigned int)-1;
> +     regmap_read(ts->mfd_tscadc->regmap_tscadc, reg, &val);
> +     return val;
>  }
>  
>  static void titsc_writel(struct titsc *tsc, unsigned int reg,
>                                       unsigned int val)
>  {
> -     writel(val, tsc->mfd_tscadc->tscadc_base + reg);
> +     regmap_write(tsc->mfd_tscadc->regmap_tscadc, reg, val);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -484,8 +489,10 @@ static int titsc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>       /* register to the input system */
>       err = input_register_device(input_dev);
> -     if (err)
> +     if (err) {
> +             dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to register input device\n");
>               goto err_free_irq;
> +     }
>  
>       platform_set_drvdata(pdev, ts_dev);
>       return 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c b/drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c
> index bd127bd..a27401a 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c
> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ static unsigned int tscadc_readl(struct ti_tscadc_dev 
> *tsadc, unsigned int reg)
>  {
>       unsigned int val;
>
????  What is this doing here? It's not doing the move to regmap but rather 
setting a default value.
> +     val = (unsigned int)-1;
>       regmap_read(tsadc->regmap_tscadc, reg, &val);
>       return val;
>  }
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to