> Doug posted a patch [0] to fix the issue you are reporting but it was not
> picked. I tested that the patch applies on top of linux-next + the latest
> cros_ec cleanups (that includes a patch for this i2c driver and was taken
> by Lee. So I think is safe for you take Doug's patch through your tree
> since it seems to not cause any conflict with the mfd tree.

OK, thanks for the heads up. I picked it.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to