On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 10:33 PM, Olliver Schinagl > <o.schin...@ultimaker.com> wrote: > >> From: Olliver Schinagl <oli...@schinagl.nl> >> >> The gpio binding document says that new code should always use named >> gpios. Patch 40b73183 added support to parse a list of gpios from child >> nodes, but does not make it possible to use named gpios. This patch adds >> the con_id property and implements it is done in gpiolib.c, where the >> old-style of using unnamed gpios still works. >> >> Signed-off-by: Olliver Schinagl <oli...@schinagl.nl> >> --- >> drivers/gpio/devres.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- >> drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys_polled.c | 2 +- >> drivers/leds/leds-gpio.c | 2 +- >> include/linux/gpio/consumer.h | 1 + > > Alexandre: does this match your vision of how it should work, i.e. ACK?
Pretty much, yes - as I mentioned in the previous versions there may be shortcomings for ACPI, but we need a refactor of the whole thing - nothing that this patch should address by itself. So this patch: Reviewed-by: Alexandre Courbot <acour...@nvidia.com> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
