On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 10:04:45PM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > The GPIOD API can be used from boardcode, so that > the DT check can be removed. To avoid breaking > existing boardcode, _optional() variant has been > chosen. For completly removing the DT check, the > regulator has also been made optional, so that it > could be supplied from boardcode. > > As a side-effect the patch fixes the after-probe > reset GPIO state, so that the device is not kept > in reset state. > > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/input/touchscreen/tsc2005.c | 47 > ++++++++++++++----------------------- > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/tsc2005.c > b/drivers/input/touchscreen/tsc2005.c > index f82b860..bf1b782 100644 > --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/tsc2005.c > +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/tsc2005.c > @@ -30,11 +30,11 @@ > #include <linux/delay.h> > #include <linux/pm.h> > #include <linux/of.h> > -#include <linux/of_gpio.h> > #include <linux/spi/spi.h> > #include <linux/spi/tsc2005.h> > #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h> > #include <linux/regmap.h> > +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h> > > /* > * The touchscreen interface operates as follows: > @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ struct tsc2005 { > > struct regulator *vio; > > - int reset_gpio; > + struct gpio_desc *reset_gpio; > void (*set_reset)(bool enable); > }; > > @@ -318,8 +318,8 @@ static void tsc2005_stop_scan(struct tsc2005 *ts) > > static void tsc2005_set_reset(struct tsc2005 *ts, bool enable) > { > - if (ts->reset_gpio >= 0) > - gpio_set_value(ts->reset_gpio, enable); > + if (ts->reset_gpio) > + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ts->reset_gpio, enable); > else if (ts->set_reset) > ts->set_reset(enable); > } > @@ -611,34 +611,23 @@ static int tsc2005_probe(struct spi_device *spi) > ts->x_plate_ohm = x_plate_ohm; > ts->esd_timeout = esd_timeout; > > - if (np) { > - ts->reset_gpio = of_get_named_gpio(np, "reset-gpios", 0); > - if (ts->reset_gpio == -EPROBE_DEFER) > - return ts->reset_gpio; > - if (ts->reset_gpio < 0) { > - dev_err(&spi->dev, "error acquiring reset gpio: %d\n", > - ts->reset_gpio); > - return ts->reset_gpio; > - } > + ts->reset_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&spi->dev, "reset", > + GPIOD_OUT_HIGH); > + if (IS_ERR(ts->reset_gpio)) { > + error = PTR_ERR(ts->reset_gpio); > + dev_err(&spi->dev, "error acquiring reset gpio: %d\n", error); > + return error; > + } > > - error = devm_gpio_request_one(&spi->dev, ts->reset_gpio, 0, > - "reset-gpios"); > - if (error) { > - dev_err(&spi->dev, "error requesting reset gpio: %d\n", > - error); > - return error; > - } > + ts->vio = devm_regulator_get_optional(&spi->dev, "vio"); > + if (IS_ERR(ts->vio)) { > + error = PTR_ERR(ts->vio); > + dev_err(&spi->dev, "vio regulator missing (%d)", error); > + return error; > + }
I wonder if we should actually make it devm_regulator_get()because if we have full constraints then we'll simply get a dummy regulator here if vio-supply is not defined. Can be done as a follow-up though. I've applied all 5. Thanks. -- Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
