On Mon, 28 Sep 2015, Sedat Dilek wrote:

> When compiling Linux v4.2+ and v4.3-rc2+ with a llvmlinux patchset
> and CLANG v3.7 I see a BUG line like this:
> 
> [   24.705463] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at 
> kernel/workqueue.c:2680
> [   24.705576] in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 1447, name: acpid
> 
> After some vital help from workqueue and hid folks it turned out to be
> a problem in the hid area.
> 
> Jiri encouraged me to look into del_timer-sync()/cancel_work_sync().
> So, I disassembled kernel/time/timer.o.
> This looked good.
> 
> Both functions are called in hid_cancel_delayed_stuff().

Yeah, but we're enabling IRQs before calling hid_cancel_delayed_stuff() 
(or, to be more precise, we're restoring original flags, and I don't see 
usbhid_close() being called with IRQs off).

Therefore ...

[ ... snip ... ]
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c b/drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c
> index 36712e9f56c2..188f59348ec5 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c
> @@ -729,16 +729,16 @@ void usbhid_close(struct hid_device *hid)
>        * data acquistion due to a resumption we no longer
>        * care about
>        */
> -     spin_lock_irq(&usbhid->lock);
> +     spin_lock_bh(&usbhid->lock);
>       if (!--hid->open) {
> -             spin_unlock_irq(&usbhid->lock);
> +             spin_unlock_bh(&usbhid->lock);
>               hid_cancel_delayed_stuff(usbhid);

I still don't understand how this should be improving anything. I believe 
spin_unlock_irq() should just re-enable interrupts, because we've been 
called with them enabled as well.

Now if you are able to see how usbhid_close() can be called with IRQs 
off, that would be a completely different story. But if that's not the 
case, the warning is bogus, and gcc-compiled kernels are right about not 
issuing it.

But without that, I so far fail to see how this is a correct thing to do.

Thanks,

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to