On Thu, 2024-11-28 at 11:06 +0100, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> From: Roberto Sassu <[email protected]>
> 
> Commit 11c60f23ed13 ("integrity: Remove unused macro
> IMA_ACTION_RULE_FLAGS") removed the IMA_ACTION_RULE_FLAGS mask, due to it
> not being used after commit 0d73a55208e9 ("ima: re-introduce own integrity
> cache lock").
> 
> However, it seems that the latter commit mistakenly used the wrong mask
> when moving the code from ima_inode_post_setattr() to
> process_measurement(). There is no mention in the commit message about this
> change and it looks quite important, since changing from IMA_ACTIONS_FLAGS
> (later renamed to IMA_NONACTION_FLAGS) to IMA_ACTION_RULE_FLAGS was done by
> commit 42a4c603198f0 ("ima: fix ima_inode_post_setattr").
> 
> Restore the original change, but with new mask 0xfb000000 since the
> policy-specific flags changed meanwhile, and rename IMA_ACTION_RULE_FLAGS
> to IMA_NONACTION_RULE_FLAGS, to be consistent with IMA_NONACTION_FLAGS.

Thanks, Roberto.  Please summarize the reason for reverting the change.  
Something
like:  Restore the original change to not reset the new file status after ...

> 
> Cc: [email protected] # v4.16.x
> Fixes: 11c60f23ed13 ("integrity: Remove unused macro IMA_ACTION_RULE_FLAGS")
> Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <[email protected]>

> ---
>  security/integrity/ima/ima.h      | 1 +
>  security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
> index 22c3b87cfcac..32ffef2cc92a 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
> @@ -141,6 +141,7 @@ struct ima_kexec_hdr {
>  
>  /* IMA iint policy rule cache flags */
>  #define IMA_NONACTION_FLAGS  0xff000000
> +#define IMA_NONACTION_RULE_FLAGS     0xfb000000
>  #define IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED  0x01000000
>  #define IMA_PERMIT_DIRECTIO  0x02000000
>  #define IMA_NEW_FILE         0x04000000
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c 
> b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> index 712c3a522e6c..83e467ad18d4 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> @@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const 
> struct
> cred *cred,
>               /* reset appraisal flags if ima_inode_post_setattr was called */
>               iint->flags &= ~(IMA_APPRAISE | IMA_APPRAISED |
>                                IMA_APPRAISE_SUBMASK | IMA_APPRAISED_SUBMASK |
> -                              IMA_NONACTION_FLAGS);
> +                              IMA_NONACTION_RULE_FLAGS);
>  
>       /*
>        * Re-evaulate the file if either the xattr has changed or the


Reply via email to