On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 01:08:36PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> We discussed a bit on v3, but I'm open to change it:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/nrn4ur66lz2ocbkkjl2bgiex3xbp552szerfhalsaefunqxf7p@ki7xf66zrf6u/
>
> I tried to keep the logic of whether or not the driver is needed all in
> the tpm_svsm_probe()/snp_svsm_vtpm_probe() (where I check for SVSM).
> If you prefer to move some pieces here, though, I'm open.
Yes please.
It doesn't make a whole lotta sense right now to register a TPM platform
driver at one place without even knowing you're running with an SVSM inside
the guest blob or not.
The usual approach is to register upon a successful detection.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
