From: Frederick Lawler <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 30d68cb0c37ebe2dc63aa1d46a28b9163e61caa2 ]

On IMA policy update, if a measure rule exists in the policy,
IMA_MEASURE is set for ima_policy_flags which makes the violation_check
variable always true. Coupled with a no-action on MAY_READ for a
FILE_CHECK call, we're always taking the inode_lock().

This becomes a performance problem for extremely heavy read-only workloads.
Therefore, prevent this only in the case there's no action to be taken.

Signed-off-by: Frederick Lawler <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Roberto Sassu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
---
 security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c 
b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
index 98308a2bdef6e..068edb0d79f73 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
@@ -235,7 +235,9 @@ static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const 
struct cred *cred,
                                &allowed_algos);
        violation_check = ((func == FILE_CHECK || func == MMAP_CHECK ||
                            func == MMAP_CHECK_REQPROT) &&
-                          (ima_policy_flag & IMA_MEASURE));
+                          (ima_policy_flag & IMA_MEASURE) &&
+                          ((action & IMA_MEASURE) ||
+                           (file->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE)));
        if (!action && !violation_check)
                return 0;
 
-- 
2.39.5


Reply via email to