On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 10:04:13AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 9/18/25 09:15, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 06:06:31PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 04:39:37PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > > > > On 9/16/25 07:48, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > The pre-existing kselftest for TPM2 is derived works of my earlier > > > > > Python > > > > > based rudimentary TPM2 stack called 'tpm2-scripts'. > > > > > > > > > > In order to get more coverage and more mainintainable and extensible > > > > > test > > > > > suite I'd like to eventually rewrite the tests with bash and tpm2sh, > > > > > which > > > > > is a TPM2 cli written with Rust and based on my new TPM2 stack [1] > > > > > [2]. > > > > > > > > > > Given linux-rust work, would it be acceptable to require cargo to > > > > > install > > > > > a runner for kselftest? > > What is runner for kselftest in this context?
It would really just a bash commanding tpm2sh and with conditional check the binding is kept loose. BR, Jarkko
