On Tue, 2026-01-27 at 15:03 +0000, Dmitry Safonov via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
> 
> ima_init_crypto() skips initializing ima_algo_array[i] if the algorithm
> from ima_tpm_chip->allocated_banks[i].crypto_id is not supported.
> It seems avoid adding the unsupported algorithm to ima_algo_array will
> break all the logic that relies on indexing by NR_BANKS(ima_tpm_chip).

The patch looks good, although I didn't try yet myself.

I would make the commit message slightly better, with a more fluid
explanation.

ima_tpm_chip->allocated_banks[i].crypto_id is initialized to
HASH_ALGO__LAST if the TPM algorithm is not supported. However there
are places relying on the algorithm to be valid because it is accessed
by hash_algo_name[].

Thus solve the problem by creating a file name that does not depend on
the crypto algorithm to be initialized, ...

Also print the template entry digest as populated by IMA.

Something along these lines.

Also, I have a preference for lower case instead of capital case for
the file name, given the other names.

Could you also avoid the >, otherwise the mailer thinks it is a reply?

Thanks

Roberto

> On 6.12.40 I observe the following read out-of-bounds in hash_algo_name:
> 
> > ==================================================================
> > BUG: KASAN: global-out-of-bounds in 
> > create_securityfs_measurement_lists+0x396/0x440
> > Read of size 8 at addr ffffffff83e18138 by task swapper/0/1
> > 
> > CPU: 4 UID: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.12.40 #3
> > Call Trace:
> >  <TASK>
> >  dump_stack_lvl+0x61/0x90
> >  print_report+0xc4/0x580
> >  ? kasan_addr_to_slab+0x26/0x80
> >  ? create_securityfs_measurement_lists+0x396/0x440
> >  kasan_report+0xc2/0x100
> >  ? create_securityfs_measurement_lists+0x396/0x440
> >  create_securityfs_measurement_lists+0x396/0x440
> >  ima_fs_init+0xa3/0x300
> >  ima_init+0x7d/0xd0
> >  init_ima+0x28/0x100
> >  do_one_initcall+0xa6/0x3e0
> >  kernel_init_freeable+0x455/0x740
> >  kernel_init+0x24/0x1d0
> >  ret_from_fork+0x38/0x80
> >  ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20
> >  </TASK>
> > 
> > The buggy address belongs to the variable:
> >  hash_algo_name+0xb8/0x420
> > 
> > The buggy address belongs to the physical page:
> > page: refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x107ce18
> > flags: 0x8000000000002000(reserved|zone=2)
> > raw: 8000000000002000 ffffea0041f38608 ffffea0041f38608 0000000000000000
> > raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000
> > page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
> > 
> > Memory state around the buggy address:
> >  ffffffff83e18000: 00 01 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 00 01 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9
> >  ffffffff83e18080: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > > ffffffff83e18100: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 00 05 f9 f9
> >                                         ^
> >  ffffffff83e18180: f9 f9 f9 f9 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 04 f9 f9 f9 f9
> >  ffffffff83e18200: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 04 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9
> > ==================================================================
> 
> Seems like the TPM chip supports sha3_256, which isn't yet in
> tpm_algorithms:
> > tpm tpm0: TPM with unsupported bank algorithm 0x0027
> 
> Use TPM_ALG_<ID> as a postfix for file names for unsupported hashing 
> algorithms.
> 
> This is how it looks on the test machine I have:
> > # ls -1 /sys/kernel/security/ima/
> > ascii_runtime_measurements
> > ascii_runtime_measurements_TPM_ALG_27
> > ascii_runtime_measurements_sha1
> > ascii_runtime_measurements_sha256
> > binary_runtime_measurements
> > binary_runtime_measurements_TPM_ALG_27
> > binary_runtime_measurements_sha1
> > binary_runtime_measurements_sha256
> > policy
> > runtime_measurements_count
> > violations
> 
> Fixes: 9fa8e7625008 ("ima: add crypto agility support for template-hash 
> algorithm")
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
> Cc: Enrico Bravi <[email protected]>
> Cc: Silvia Sisinni <[email protected]>
> Cc: Roberto Sassu <[email protected]>
> Cc: Mimi Zohar <[email protected]>
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> - Use ima_tpm_chip->allocated_banks[algo_idx].digest_size instead of 
> hash_digest_size[algo]
>   (Roberto Sassu)
> - Link to v3: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
> Testing note: I test it on v6.12.40 kernel backport, which slightly differs as
> lookup_template_data_hash_algo() was yet present.
> 
> Changes in v3:
> - Now fix the spelling *for real* (sorry, messed it up in v2)
> - Link to v2: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - Instead of skipping unknown algorithms, add files under their TPM_ALG_ID 
> (Roberto Sassu)
> - Fix spelling (Roberto Sassu)
> - Copy @stable on the fix
> - Link to v1: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
> ---
>  security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c
> index 012a58959ff0..9a00a0547619 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c
> @@ -132,16 +132,12 @@ int ima_measurements_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
>       char *template_name;
>       u32 pcr, namelen, template_data_len; /* temporary fields */
>       bool is_ima_template = false;
> -     enum hash_algo algo;
>       int i, algo_idx;
>  
>       algo_idx = ima_sha1_idx;
> -     algo = HASH_ALGO_SHA1;
>  
> -     if (m->file != NULL) {
> +     if (m->file != NULL)
>               algo_idx = (unsigned long)file_inode(m->file)->i_private;
> -             algo = ima_algo_array[algo_idx].algo;
> -     }
>  
>       /* get entry */
>       e = qe->entry;
> @@ -160,7 +156,8 @@ int ima_measurements_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
>       ima_putc(m, &pcr, sizeof(e->pcr));
>  
>       /* 2nd: template digest */
> -     ima_putc(m, e->digests[algo_idx].digest, hash_digest_size[algo]);
> +     ima_putc(m, e->digests[algo_idx].digest,
> +              ima_tpm_chip->allocated_banks[algo_idx].digest_size);
>  
>       /* 3rd: template name size */
>       namelen = !ima_canonical_fmt ? strlen(template_name) :
> @@ -229,16 +226,12 @@ static int ima_ascii_measurements_show(struct seq_file 
> *m, void *v)
>       struct ima_queue_entry *qe = v;
>       struct ima_template_entry *e;
>       char *template_name;
> -     enum hash_algo algo;
>       int i, algo_idx;
>  
>       algo_idx = ima_sha1_idx;
> -     algo = HASH_ALGO_SHA1;
>  
> -     if (m->file != NULL) {
> +     if (m->file != NULL)
>               algo_idx = (unsigned long)file_inode(m->file)->i_private;
> -             algo = ima_algo_array[algo_idx].algo;
> -     }
>  
>       /* get entry */
>       e = qe->entry;
> @@ -252,7 +245,8 @@ static int ima_ascii_measurements_show(struct seq_file 
> *m, void *v)
>       seq_printf(m, "%2d ", e->pcr);
>  
>       /* 2nd: template hash */
> -     ima_print_digest(m, e->digests[algo_idx].digest, 
> hash_digest_size[algo]);
> +     ima_print_digest(m, e->digests[algo_idx].digest,
> +                      ima_tpm_chip->allocated_banks[algo_idx].digest_size);
>  
>       /* 3th:  template name */
>       seq_printf(m, " %s", template_name);
> @@ -404,16 +398,24 @@ static int __init 
> create_securityfs_measurement_lists(void)
>               char file_name[NAME_MAX + 1];
>               struct dentry *dentry;
>  
> -             sprintf(file_name, "ascii_runtime_measurements_%s",
> -                     hash_algo_name[algo]);
> +             if (algo == HASH_ALGO__LAST)
> +                     sprintf(file_name, 
> "ascii_runtime_measurements_TPM_ALG_%x",
> +                             ima_tpm_chip->allocated_banks[i].alg_id);
> +             else
> +                     sprintf(file_name, "ascii_runtime_measurements_%s",
> +                             hash_algo_name[algo]);
>               dentry = securityfs_create_file(file_name, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP,
>                                               ima_dir, (void *)(uintptr_t)i,
>                                               &ima_ascii_measurements_ops);
>               if (IS_ERR(dentry))
>                       return PTR_ERR(dentry);
>  
> -             sprintf(file_name, "binary_runtime_measurements_%s",
> -                     hash_algo_name[algo]);
> +             if (algo == HASH_ALGO__LAST)
> +                     sprintf(file_name, 
> "binary_runtime_measurements_TPM_ALG_%x",
> +                             ima_tpm_chip->allocated_banks[i].alg_id);
> +             else
> +                     sprintf(file_name, "binary_runtime_measurements_%s",
> +                             hash_algo_name[algo]);
>               dentry = securityfs_create_file(file_name, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP,
>                                               ima_dir, (void *)(uintptr_t)i,
>                                               &ima_measurements_ops);
> 
> ---
> base-commit: 63804fed149a6750ffd28610c5c1c98cce6bd377
> change-id: 20260127-ima-oob-9fa83a634d7b
> 
> Best regards,


Reply via email to